The h4831sc load data Diaries

Because there isn't going to seem like any "Formal" Load Data around for this Load, can some of you offer a place to begin with this mix and items to consider when Operating this Load up?

They have executed identically for me. Like everyone else I rushed to get the more recent SC Variation but have now switched back again. Ideally you need about a hundred% loading density. Should you have sufficient scenario potential for the H4831(extensive) that you are most likely better off.

You are suitable They are really the exact same the SC is short Slash so it meters far better, I don't Consider you can find just typical 4831 any more

Sweet!! I am going to pick some up and provides it a try. Thanks men, I respect it! I will Permit you to determine what I discover. I do have about a 50 percent pound of 4350 I can consider that initial and find out what happens.

The sole variance as I comprehend it would be that the SC was designed to operate through powder measures greater (which it does). The longer grains do not feed effectively in the slightest degree in some measures. Thats my 02 :grin:

I've used H4831 and H4831SC in my 260 Rem without any change. The only thing will be the shorter Lower gives you somewhat more space. Fantastic luck!gun)

I don't like to operate up a load making use of a single great deal of powder then have to work up again simply because I operate out and possess to start out employing a new whole lot amount.

excaliber stated: I've identified the precise h4831 vs h4831sc reverse to generally be true in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with 180 g Accubonds. RL22 was a much faster and equally precise powder in my 300 Win Mag.

I have discovered the precise reverse to generally be correct in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 h4831sc was a much faster and equally exact powder in my three hundred Get Mag.

[electronic mail secured] gn and one hundred fifteen CT's, I have killed additional Deer using this combo than each of the rifles I personal put together, Function up to this though the sweet place will probably be all over 54, I am a Two Bit-06 nut and I've some stuff tat will work very well for me if your intrigued

Run your load up with the specific powder (sc or frequent) and great deal you happen to be employing though. Very same melt away fee doesn't suggest it can behave "just" precisely the same. I've viewed about one hundred fps distinction between sc and mil-surp lots of H4831.

Like All people explained, the SC stands for “shorter Lower” and is a bit easier to meter. Makes you problem why they'd still make the common one.

Am i able to think that H4831 is often substituted for H4831sc ? I understand the Bodily change but will it impact the burn off or velocity? I do think not but I am not 100% positive.

I sawed one in half to find out how thick the jackets ended up, they usually were being effortlessly twice as thick h4831 vs h4831sc like a 50-grain hollow position was. Ditto for that sixty four-grain Ability Point, as these bullets are constructed for deer, not prairie canines or woodchucks. You now know every little thing I learn about the 22-250 and sluggish-burning powders, and I don't know anything at all in any way with regards to the 223. I question that you're going to get wherever with that cartridge and 4831, but allow us to know how it goes.